Publications

March 5, 2018

10 Steps to Designing and Implementing Inclusive National Action Plans to Prevent Violent Extremism

The United Nations Plan of Action on Preventing Violent Extremism calls on each member state to “consider developing a national plan of action to prevent violent extremism which sets national priorities for addressing the local drivers of violent extremism and complements national counter-terrorism strategies where they already exist.”
It further reinforces the need for a “whole of society approach to PVE and encourages member states to engage fully the breadth of civil society and other local actors in the development of national action plans, including women’s and youth organizations. This recognizes that a vibrant independent civil society is a critical pillar for preventing violent extremism and promoting social cohesion.

 

January 17, 2018

As part of its ongoing effort to facilitate greater collaboration between civil society organizations (CSOs) government, multilateral institutions, and other key stakeholders involved in preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE), and promoting ‘whole of society’ approaches to P/CVE more broadly, the Prevention Project convened the second in a series of roundtables on ‘Ensuring an Inclusive Approach to the Development and Implementation of National P/CVE Action Plans: The Role of Civil Society’. The roundtable, which follows one the Prevention Project organized in New York in December, included different stakeholders involved in the design and implementation of P/CVE National Action Plans (NAPs), including from the United States and other national governments, as well as from the United Nations and research, peacebuilding, and other non-government organizations. Throughout the discussion, participants put forward practical recommendations related to ongoing P/CVE NAP efforts.

On 24 January 2018, the Prevention Project, together with the International Civil Society Action Network (ICAN) and some 60 other civil society actors and organizations from around the globe with expertise on and experience in preventing violent extremism, sent a letter to the UN Under-Secretary-General for Counter-Terrorism, Mr. Vladimir Voronkov.  The signatories include both international and local civil society organizations (CSOs) working across a range of issues, including human rights, peacebuilding, youth engagement, gender  empowerment, and education. The letter includes a number of suggestions and recommendations for Mr. Voronkov and the new UN Office on Counter-Terrorism (OCT) to consider in 2018.

These include:

1. Championing  a “whole-of-society” approach  that works with local leaders and civil society to address terrorism and the conditions conducive to it; this would include raising awareness among UN Member States why governments should consider CSOs allies rather than adversaries when it comes to PVE and countering terrorism, and the practical steps governments should take to empower and support CSOs in this context.
2. Emphasizing to Member States  the centrality of protecting human rights when addressing the threats of violent extremism and terrorism, with evidence showing that support for terrorism and violent extremism is strongly correlated with violence perpetrated by states against their own populations, in certain cases as part of or in the name of CT operations.  In this regard, the signatories ask Mr. Voronkov and his office to:

• speak out against violations of human rights committed in the name of countering terrorism;
• prioritize the provision of technical support and guidance to Member States to ensure their PVE and CT laws and strategies are fully compliant with international human rights law;
• facilitate or deliver assistance focused on building trust and otherwise facilitating effective engagement between the security sector, including the police, and communities, particularly those where feelings of marginalization or exclusion persist;
• organize with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights a high-level event focused on the intersection between the protection of freedoms of expression, religion, and other fundamental freedoms and rights and effectively preventing violent extremism and countering terrorism;

3. Prioritizing meaningful engagement between OCT and civil society, including women- and youth-led organizations and human rights defenders; this would involve:

• meeting with independent CSOs during OCT country visits;
• providing funding and other support through the UN Center on Counter-Terrorism to the growing number of civil society organizations and networks with PVE and CT expertise;
• urging Member States to include CSOs working across the spectrum of PVE and CT issues in the development, implementation, and evaluation of PVE national action plans, strategies, and programs; and
• meeting regularly with the wide range of CSOs active on these issues

The signatories  underscored their commitment to constructive collaboration with Mr. Voronkov, the OCT, and the wider UN system on the PVE and CT agendas and look forward to realizing such collaboration in 2018, in anticipation of the sixth biennial review of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy this summer, and beyond.

December 7, 2017

10 Steps to Strengthening Rehabilitation and Reintegration Efforts for Terrorism Offenders, Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters, and Victims of Violent Extremism

Managing the return of the many individuals who have traveled to conflict zones and the growing number defecting from terrorist groups is a priority for many countries. Effective and sustainable rehabilitation and reintegration (R&R) programs are essential to addressing this challenge and preventing violent extremism over the long term. Governments cannot do this work alone and should work with civil society and other local actors. Effective R&R requires attention and action at the state, community, public discourse, family, and individual levels. Because R&R is an individual, psychosocial process that requires the sustained engagement and involvement of local communities, families, and other supportive social networks, civil society has a unique contribution to make. Civil society organizations (CSOs) often have the trust of and access to the affected individuals and communities in ways that government officials do not.

Download Publication

By Eric Rosand | October 19, 2017

Observing recent developments in the United States, one might assume that countering/preventing violent extremism (CVE or PVE) is a quickly disappearing policy fad of the Obama administration. These efforts encompass a range of law enforcement and non-law enforcement means to prevent individuals from being radicalized to violence, with a focus on addressing the grievances that make individuals vulnerable to recruitment to terrorist organizations and intervening before individuals become violent.

The Trump administration has zeroed out the short-lived Department of Homeland Security CVE grants program, effectively disbanded the inter-agency CVE task force, and showed nothing but disdain for the CVE policy of the Obama-era that sought to empower communities and catalyze locally-led interventions to build resilience against violent extremism across the ideological spectrum. Most recently, in her Congressional testimony last month on “Threats to the Homeland,” Acting Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security Elaine Duke eschewed the “countering violent extremism” framing of the Obama-era, pivoting instead to what the current White House views to be the more muscular and targeted label of “terrorism prevention.”

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/10/19/how-international-development-institutions-are-becoming-hubs-for-addressing-violent-extremism/